A public bank is a financial institution owned by a government entity to serve public interests rather than prioritize profits. Public banks have a fundamentally different ownership structure and mission compared to traditional private banks.
There has been growing interest in public banks as an alternative model that can better meet local community needs.
Defining Public Banks
At its core, a public bank is chartered, owned, and governed by a government body rather than private individuals or corporations. The government entity may be at the federal, state, or local level. They have direct control over the bank’s oversight and activities.
Public banks first emerged to hold governments’ money and handle basic financial services on their behalf. However, their role has expanded over time. Public banks can use their funds to provide loans and other banking services to individuals, businesses, and public agencies within their jurisdiction.
How Public Banks Operate
Public banks function much like traditional banks in their day-to-day operations. They handle deposits, facilitate transfers, provide loans, and offer other financial services to customers. Public banks also have to follow banking regulations and maintain financial soundness like private banks.
The key differences lie in their ownership, priorities, and use of profits. A private bank aims to maximize returns for its shareholders. A public bank is focused on furthering economic development and serving the public interest.
Public banks can lend at lower interest rates for infrastructure projects, schools, affordable housing programs, and other public initiatives. Their profits are returned to the government entity rather than given to private shareholders through dividends or stock buybacks.
Public Banking in Practice
The Bank of North Dakota established in 1919 is the only active public bank in the U.S. today. It helped the state avoid the worst impacts of the 2008 financial crisis by sustaining lending and protecting home values. North Dakota leaders credit the bank for the state’s robust economy.
Internationally, the Sparkassen network serves over 50 million customers in Germany. These locally-focused public banks have supported community development since the 1700s.
Recently, grassroots public banking movements have grown in California, New Jersey, New Mexico, and other states. Cities like San Francisco and Los Angeles are actively exploring public bank options to better serve their communities.
Also Read: What is a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR)
Pros and Cons of Public Banks
Public banks come with unique potential benefits as well as risks to consider:
Potential Benefits
- More affordable financing for public infrastructure and services
- Resources directed based on public needs rather than profit
- Countercyclical lending during recessions
- Banking services for underserved communities
Potential Risks
- High startup costs and regulatory requirements
- Unproven model at larger scales
- Political interference and mismanagement
- Lack of competition can lead to poor service
While public banks are not a cure-all solution, they can provide an alternative model that better aligns with public interests in some cases. More real-world examples are needed to better understand how effectively public banks can meet their goals.
Conclusion
The core differentiator of public banks is their public ownership and mandate to benefit local communities. Public banks can complement private options by providing affordable financing for schools, infrastructure, and other public services. As interest in public banking spreads, more governments are grappling with whether the potential benefits outweigh the risks and challenges involved with this model.